TL;DR - #Dictionarygate 2: #RedefineWomen HD

Same shit different day. InB4 organized false flagging attempt. Some words have positive meanings, some negative, we need this to differentiate things that are positive from things that are negative. Pretty simple. Unless we want to start calling things "ungood" just to spare women having words that are negative associated with them when they just so happen to be anything less than perfect. This is not a gendered issue. If you wish to discuss removing gendered references from the dictionary to make it more strict and formal, that could be an interesting thing to consider but kindly cease making ungendered issues into gendered ones. Sources: http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2016/08/29/redefine-women-google-sexist-word-defintion-_n_11762576.html https://mic.com/articles/152749/google-sexist-word-definitions-redefine-women?utm_source=policymicTBLR&utm_medium=main&utm_campaign=social#.jYybKB200 The exact same thing that happened however many months/years/decades ago: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VIpMgh7aY74 Donations are greatly appreciated and enable me to acquire the delicious berries I need to live: https://www.patreon.com/TealDeer Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for fair use for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.