125 mm 3BM9 APFSDS-T Vs Leopard 2 # Armor Penetration Simulation HD

This Video presents 125 mm smooth bar 3VBM3/3BM9/10 APFSDS-T penetration with Leopard 2 tank. This video present the study on leopard front armor plate angle impact on APFSDS. This video highlights various angle of impact. It is observed that, the 3BM9 is failed to penetrate the leopard-2 tank due to its unique front armor plate angle. APFSDS instead of penetrating it slightly deviates upwards. The Johnson + Cook material model is used for projectile. High velocity of 1800 m/s is applied to the projectile. The leopard tank 2 have composite armor but in present simulation we assumed rolled homogeneous armor as material. The Leopard 2 is a main battle tank developed by Krauss-Maffei in the 1970s for the West German Army. While 3BM9 is Armour-piercing fin-stabilized discarding sabot tracer or APFSDS-T rounds entered service in 1962 by Soviet Union. Please subscribe to our channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC0UuZWRSqR-qe_bGyXd0jww?sub_confirmation=1 Music Credits: https://www.bensound.com/ Other Similar Videos: 1. 7.62 NATO x 51mm Bullet Penetration on Aluminum Plate # Finite Element Analysis , Failed Penetration2 https://youtu.be/L6XrzuAJL-g 2. 120 mm KE M829A2 APFSDS Vs T44 Tank Armor Inclined Plate https://youtu.be/yohLMty56P0 3. Armor Piercing Bullet Penetration on Aluminum Plate # Finite Element Analysis , Failed Penetration https://youtu.be/1ZI-RmWWMP8 4. 125mm BM15 APFSDS Projectile Impact on 250 BHN RHA #Armor Piercing Simulation https://youtu.be/eAlp_8XdTbM 5.Shot, A.P., 90mm, T33 Vs Pz Kpfw V (Panther) Tank # Armor Piercing simulation https://youtu.be/b8GfGRzsIMk 6. Low Quality Armor Vs Reinforced Concrete and Steel Bars # Armor Piercing simulation https://youtu.be/B8CXvrqMjRg 7.BM15 APFSDS Vs 250 BHN RHA #Armor Piercing Simulation https://youtu.be/8c1JyfY9rVU